¿Puede ser el segundo argumento de Z13 defendible por tesis universalista? Consideración de algunos argumentos universalistas

Saint Valentino Cabezas Nova

doi:10.28970/hh.2022.1.a4

Artículos de investigación

Can a universalist thesis defend Z13’s second argument? Consideration of universalist arguments

Authors

Saint Valentino Cabezas Nova Universidad Nacional de Colombia ,

The aim of this paper is to analyze the some Universalists defenses about the second argument of Z13 in which is denied the universal to be form and this way denies the possibility to be primary substance. This analysis is divided in two parts: in first part it is claimed that, according to textual evidence in Z, there is a false premise and this leads to the general instructor of one of the main universalist arguments is inconsistent. The second part of the analysis is due to show some several important distinctions not drawn which lead to that the universalist argument is inconsistent.

Keywords:

Universals, particulars, Woods, form, substance

Aristóteles. (2017). Libro Z de la metafísica de Aristóteles (A. Correa, trad.). No publicado.

Aristóteles. (1982). Metafísica (Met.) (T. Calvo Martínez, trad.). Gredos.

Bostock, D. (1994). Aristotle. Metaphysics Z and H. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00262329

Galluzzo, G. (2013). Substance in Aristotle's Metaphysics, Book Z. En The Medieval Reception of Book Zeta of Aristotle's Metaphysics. Aristotle's Ontology and the Middle Ages: The Tradition of Met, Book Z (vol. 1). Brill, pp. 19-140. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004235021_003

Galluzzo, G. y Mariani, M. (2006). Aristotle's Metaphysics Book Z: The Contemporary Debate. Edizioni della Normale. Scoula Normale Superiore.

Kar, E. (2021). Particulars and Universals in Aristotelian Substance Theory. Archives of Philosophy, 0(55), pp. 35-48. https://doi.org/10.26650/arcp.1012750

Lesher, J. (1971). Aristotle on Form, Substance and Universals: A Dilemma. Phronesis, 16, pp. 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852871X00115

Page, C. (1985). Predicating Forms of Matter in Aristotle's Metaphysics. The Review of Metaphysics, 39, pp. 57-82.

Teloh, H. (1979). Aristotle's "Metaphysics" Z13. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 9, pp. 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1979.10716237

Woods, M. (1993). From, Species and Predication in Aristotle. Logic and Metaphysics in Aristotle in Early Modern. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064009

Cabezas Nova, S. V. (2022). Can a universalist thesis defend Z13’s second argument? Consideration of universalist arguments. Humanitas Hodie, 5(1), H51a4. https://doi.org/10.28970/hh.2022.1.a4

Download Citation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

PDF (Spanish)

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022)

Published

2022-10-03

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

How to Cite

Cabezas Nova, S. V. (2022). Can a universalist thesis defend Z13’s second argument? Consideration of universalist arguments. Humanitas Hodie, 5(1), H51a4. https://doi.org/10.28970/hh.2022.1.a4

Download Citation

Author Biography

Saint Valentino Cabezas Nova, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Estudiante de en Filosofía, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.